.
Feedback

State Law Would Keep Undesirable Chain Stores Out

Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele proposes legislation allowing municipalities to deny a "formula" store permission to move to town.

The growing pervasiveness of chain stores is something New York State's historic villages and towns have fought to halt in their communities for years, and now state says he has the legislation that will do just that.

A new bill Thiele has drafted, if passed, would give municipalities the express authority to enact restrictions and prohibitions on "formula" retail uses, i.e. chain stores with standardized merchandise, apparel, facades, decor and signage. It should come as welcome news to preservationists who worry that chains replacing independent businesses and mom and pop stores will erode community character.

“This is a recurring issue that local governments are dealing with not just on the East End of Long Island, but certainly across the country," Thiele said, adding that he saw it come up as the village attorney for Sag Harbor. The village wanted to regulate formula stores, “but it was unclear whether they had the authority under state law,” he said.

"Because of a lack of state legislation, there’s been really a kind of chilling effect," Thiele said.

He noted that his proposed law is not a mandate — it only gives villages and towns the option.

The assemblyman said that some communities on Long Island welcome chain stores, but in others, particularity on the East End, where virtually every village has a historic district and a comprehensive plan to protect its character through zoning, his proposal will help.

“There is a concern about maintaining community character, that historic nature, that sense that makes each village different,” Thiele said.

Southampton Village Mayor Mark Epley said he supports Thiele's bill.

“This is perfect for us because it really follows suit with our village business district zoning regulations and architectural guidelines that we're working on putting in place,” he said.

Thiele said that such laws have been court tested in other communities across the country and what he found in his research is that a law designed to preserve community character will withstand a challenge. However, if a law is implemented to give a competitive advantage to local businesses, it will not be upheld. “If all that’s in the record is economic competition, I think there’s trouble,” he said, adding that his law helps make the necessary distinction.

Epley said that Southampton Village's existing zoning laws have kept out chain stores of a certain size. "Most of our buildings don’t meet the minimum square foot requirements for most of these large, big box stores." And that's the way he likes it: “We redid the code in an effort to try to keep the charcter of the village a little bit smaller,” he said.

The mayor said the village doesn't want to kick out all chains. He pointed to on Main Street, saying it is a beautiful store that meets all size requirements, participates in the community and hires local people; “They do all the things you want businesses to do.”

When a village has the right to say yes or no to chain stores, it becomes a balancing act, Epley said, as the village board has to consider the occupancy rate of retail space.

The proposed legislation is specific to retail uses, and does not mention chain eateries.

Thiele said he is trying to get as many co-sponsors on board as he can before officially filing the legislation, and a copy of the bill was sent to his counterpart in the State Senate, Sen. Kenneth P. LaValle, R-Port Jefferson.

Faustina March 5, 2012 at 02:11 pm
Has Fred Thiele been listening to what's going on in Southampton? Tuckahoe to be specific. Maintaining current zoning would achieve what he is shooting for and that is under siege daily, as in the King Kullen "Shopping Center" blessed by Anna Throne Holst, Or does he just think as long as it happens in Tuckahoe the "historic" Village character is protected.
Brendan J. O'Reilly (Editor) March 5, 2012 at 05:20 pm
Via Southampton Patch's Facebook Page:
Debi commented, "definitely keep the chain stores out of the Hamptons...that's what makes us unique" Edana added, "Save What's Left of the North Fork, too!"
Brendan J. O'Reilly (Editor) March 5, 2012 at 06:29 pm
Krystyna commented on Facebook: "So the opposite of what East Hampton has become."
Preliator March 5, 2012 at 07:59 pm
Yes, let's curb free enterprise and initiative this way not too many people will complain when you can enact restrictions and prohibitions on the type of people who can visit here or 'gasp' even move here. We have tohave the 'right kind' of people here to go to the government approved stores, why not? We already have some saying if you are not born on Long Island you can not run for office here so why not, let's just keep letting government (fed, state, local telling people what they can and can not do, I love it.
Diane Sadowski March 7, 2012 at 05:07 pm
We simply dont need more laws!!!!!!!!!
Diane Sadowski March 7, 2012 at 09:17 pm
The Mayor said what? Oh BTW "BROOKS Brothers is ok". So what historical value does that chain have? Really. That is one reason such a law is just bunk!
smacw March 9, 2012 at 12:01 am
Brooks Brothers founded 1818 and probably been outfitting summer colony residents since the 1880s
Yes, silly law, especially given the retail vacancy rate in the village. I think there is a spot for nearly every retailer residents of all kinds need and want
smacw March 9, 2012 at 12:04 am
By all means though, have local laws governing signage, lighting, etc

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Southampton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Maud Nordwald Pollock June 18, 2013 at 04:37 pm
Sid you must be a shill it shows by your ignorance.
Sid Viscuous June 18, 2013 at 05:19 pm
What's the matter, Maud, didn't think anyone would call you out on your lunatic conspiracy theory?Read More Your entire thesis is steeped in teaparty bs and supported by links to youtube nuts and right wing organizations. You dispute global warming because you are a shill of corporat liars who use your ignorance to promote their agenda. Yours is at textbook case of science denial "There are a number of areas of science where the evidence has become so overwhelming that a scientific consensus forms. For example, the consensus on the link between smoking and cancer, that HIV causes AIDS or that humans are causing global warming. Where there is a scientific consensus, there are often movements that deny the scientific evidence. All of these denialist movements have been found to share 5 common characteristics, including cherry picking, conspiracy theories and fake experts."
K9SAR June 18, 2013 at 06:17 pm
Maud, Thanks for the info. I looked it up online. Very scary stuff. The Town of Southampton isRead More playing with fire with plans for Sustainability. Just another word for Agenda 21. What fools would want to go along with this scam? Guess they want to rule our lives just like the U.N. wants to do with our property rights, food, and fuel.